I received a message that my site was disapproved today, so they’re the first ones to fail out of my newest ad network comparison experiment.

Looking closer at their policies I see this (bold added by me):

“Our program has been designed for sites with premium content. Sites that promote, contain, or link directly to the following types of content shall not be approved.

• Adult, Pornographic or any illegal content
• Tobacco, alcohol, ammunition, hazardous substances, illegal drugs, gore, violence, gambling and racism content
• Pages containing profanity or content that and/or discriminates or is offensive to any section of people
• Hate, violence, racial intolerance, or advocate against any individual, group, or organization
• Sale of prescription drugs
• Sale of counterfeit products, imitations of designer or other goods, stolen items or any products that infringe intellectual property rights of other parties
• Contain programs which promote invalid click activity by paying users to clicking on ads, browse websites, read email etc.
• Websites that contain forums, discussion boards, chat rooms, or any content area that is open to public updates without adequate moderation
• Sites with content that has been generated using computer programs and hence may not be comprehendible.
• Bulk of the content is user-generated
• Sites with fake news
• Any other content that we believe in our sole discretion to be illegal”

So their network is ABSOLUTELY incompatible with a search engine since it links to everything on that list.

Still in the running are Adsaro, Adsterra, Bidvertiser, Galaksion, and RevenueHits.